the dual logical fallacies in ur argument here are wild. while i personally couldn’t care less if u took a leak on my driveway, the law doesn’t agree. between public-urination ordinances, indecent exposure, public lewdness, or disorderly conduct, a contemporary human relieving themself outdoors within public view is unlawful in most places. the overwhelming majority of municipalities do not have ordinances outlawing pet urination along a public sidewalk. even in places that explicitly mention flowers and plants, the act is legal, so long as it does not result in damaged property.
I’m also not arguing on principle or in favor of the action. of course it should be avoided if it damages to flowers. I’m saying that it’s a little too nuanced to reasonably blame someone for not being both apprised to and accutely mindful of this, without some external indication that they should be actively mitigating in a meaningful way.